Page 79 - ASEAN-EU Dialogue 2018: Regional and Inter-Regional Economic Cooperation: Identifying Priorities for ASEAN and the EU
P. 79

root process if the bargaining parameter of the insider in the firm is equal to unity under the
                                                                                                       10
               pure insider model. Otherwise, the unemployment rate would follow the stationary process  .

               Conclusion
               This chapter made an attempt to compare labour market outcomes, namely unemployment rates,
               labour  market  institutions  and  employment  protection  mechanisms,  in  Asia  and  Europe.
               Results of secondary data analysis demonstrate that there is a remarkable difference in labour
               market outcomes, especially unemployment rates, between the two regions. On the one hand,
               the main characteristic of the Asian labour market is that the unemployment rates are more
               stable and relatively lower than those in Europe.  The above differences between Asian and
               European labour market outcomes can be explained by the unique characteristics of labour
               market institutions and socio-cultural background of the two regions. In the case of Europe, the
               persistently  high  unemployment  rate  may  be  caused  by  the  provision  of  generous
               unemployment benefits. This has produced a challenge for policymakers to make a paradoxical
               balance between labour market flexibility and the employment protection. In the case of Asia,
               the relatively lower unemployment rates are mainly due to weaker unemployment protection
               mechanisms, the existence of a large informal sector and the prevailing culture of self-help in
               the region.  However, an aging population poses its own threats for some Asian countries.  In
               this regard, both Asia and Europe may be able to benefit from non-standard and flexible work
                                                     st
               systems which meet the needs of the 21  century workforce.


























               10  This paper’s theoretical foundation is based on the employment function within the insider-outsider theory
               suggested by Blanchard and Summers (1986). More recently, Gustavsson and Österholm (2007) have provided
               empirical  evidence  to  indicate  a  distinctive  difference  between  unemployment  and  employment  hysteresis.
               According to them, empirical tests tend to produce mixed evidence for hysteresis in unemployment. By contrast,
               unit root tests are able to produce more consistent results to support hysteresis in employment.
                                                                                                       73
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84