Page 83 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 83

Yaacob and Kun, 2019


               in a detailed manner, the negative and positive aspects of this novel approach, tracing back the
               historical change of function and change of use of the building, for example how it was a house
               which turns into a museum, in a step by step process.  Another remarkable workshop which
               was leading by Eduardo Souto de Moura (Photo 7), a Pritzker Prize winner in 2011, to revitalize
               a  selected  site  in  Porto,  to  carefully  place  the  new  functions  buildings  such  as  hospitals
               accommodation into that site. (Photo 6). Pacilia had benefited a lot from this workshop having
               the opportunity to visit the Siza’s work and to do the field trip study with the students.

               Pacilia expressed her admiration  for the Italians who are proud in preserving their culture
               exemplified in their homes which are almost entirely modified inside, but well preserved on
               the outside. She opined the effort done to preserve their house façade which was more out of
               respect and pride rather than merely following rules and regulations. Learning about Italian
               culture, was the most enjoyable part of staying there. Pacilia is close with the Italians, such as
               her roommate, and she mixed well with different age groups, including younger Italian students
               of architecture, her roommate’s family, church friends and classmates. She views the Italians
               as a more enclosed and preserved society and not easily to accept others while keeping close
               to their culture, although younger people are more exposed, especially in sampling different
               food. Pacilia became more laid back and patient, as the local environment and people take
               everyday life and issues slowly. She managed a few words in Italian to get by, using gestures
               and expressions, although the local Italians may have understood English, they have difficulty
               to speak or don’t want to speak. There were no bad encounters as they were very friendly.

               The program was officially to be conducted in English but a lot of the discussions were in
               Italian. During the lectures the professors would speak English but Pacilia felt that they can
               deliver better in Italian, as she tried to understand and always ask her Italian friends, as many
               of the projects are in group work format. Furthermore the documents are in Italian, although
               some Spanish speakers in the group did help. (Photo 8). It was not entirely consistent, where
               she recalled that they discussed the work again and again, but there was only one time that they
               needed to read the documentation, so Pacilia did other group work that did not require reading,
               instead. Almost all of the work are group work, where it is a struggle in the beginning, but later,
               she changed the way she felt, where she explored a bit more other facets of discovering the
               place and people. There were also difficulties with the tutors (apart from the lectures) including
               other visiting and external critics, always talking Italian, though she could guess the ones they
               translated though they did not usually translate the words she could not understand.
               The program included a visit to FAUP and Porto, where Pacilia enjoyed the Porto trip, of which
               most of it is visiting and talking about Alvaro Siza’s works in Porto. She did not know she
               liked Siza that much until she visited the Boa Nova Tea House facing the sea. She considers
               Siza’s work to belong to the sensitive and thoughtful architecture, which includes the works of
               Carlos Scarpa in Italy and Geoffrey Bawa in Sri Lanka, all of which she had visited previously.
               When she had the spare time during weekends and breaks, she went all over Italy including
               Venice,  Verona, Padova, Florence  (Photo 10),  Naples, Rome and etc.  That  was  when she
               visited the restoration of an existing building by Scarpa called the Castelvecchio Museum in
               Verona (Photo 9). The adaptive re-use program of taking an old existing building to become a
               new museum, though integrated in a modern way, by carefully and respectfully integrating the
               old and new elements together. Pacilia also visited other countries such as Spain, Switzerland,
               Netherlands, UK, Ireland and etc.
               As a girl from a small town called Banting, the Erasmus Mundus program allows for East to
               West exchange and vice versa, from staff mobility to students studying academic courses at
               various  places  around  Europe  and  Asia.  Pacilia  went  through  an  experience  in  character
               building and she expressed that she is much more at ease conversing with people from different



                                                            83
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88