Page 79 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 79

Yaacob and Kun, 2019


               During  her  stay  and  afterwards,  Naziaty  is  very  much  an  admirer  of FAUP's  architecture
               curricula,  which  concentrated  on  developing  the  technical  as  well  as  the  analytical  and
               intellectual  strength  of  the  graduates.  At  FAUP,  the  first  year  immediately  starts  with  an
               architecture process or the very least an artistic process of a hypothetical site with a measured
               scale to it, where the basics are mastered whilst the learning process is step-by-step rather than
               complicated in the beginning, directly working with models and the material, in dealing with
               space,  seamlessly  taking  abstract  (artistic)  exercises  and  quickly  converting  into  a  more
               architectural design process. At UM, where Naziaty is teaching, however, the curriculum had
               been the same since its inception 24 years ago where the artistic process is learned in the first
               year’s first semester but the human scale is not seamlessly incorporated.
               Ever eager to learn more, Naziaty had many discussions with each of the year’s studio tutor.
               Mario, the first year tutor explained that the students created an abstract model in the larger
               1:1000 scale, translated it step-by-step to the 1:50 scale, then the students worked with a 5 x 5
               x 5 metres cubic space. As well, the use of ‘styrofoam’ allowed for the excavation of spaces.
               Although it started with an artistic process (abstraction) the immediate process where they put
               a scale to it, gave a sense of space that had a reference to real life space in the minds of the
               designer. In Naziaty’s mind, such exercise is significant because doing mere artistic exercises
               and not putting it in human scale will not teach the students to understand the sense of the
               human scale and measurement.
               Naziaty  quickly  learned  that  at  FAUP,  the  architecture  faculty  members  were  not  mere
               academics,  they  were  design  practitioners  too,  and  this  dual  teaching-practice  situation  is
               similar  to  many  of  the  best  architecture  schools  in  Europe.  Moreover,  almost  all  FAUP’s
               graduates managed to gain employment after graduation, mostly in the United Kingdom even
               though their English is not that good. Their employability was due largely to their highly skilled
               architectural drawings. The students’ projects from first year to third year were using mostly
               manual  drawings. Later  in  fourth  and  fifth  year  the  students  were  allowed  to  start  with
               computer-aided drawings, unlike at UM, where the use of digital means is rushed in the second
               year. Also at FAUP, each student was expected to produce “notebooks” in which the students
               would use to practise and reflect on their work. Luis (the third year tutor) enthused that the
               better notebooks are the ones that get drawn over and over. (Photo 1). Pedro, the second year
               tutor, explained about a year-long project located near the Trindade metro station in which the
               importance of topography and the students therefore need to be sensitive to changes of levels.
               (Photo 2). The program is a cultural centre and a teaching block. The medium is totally in
               pencil or pen, which is on tracing paper. At FAUP, students are not allowed to do digital
               drawings  in  second  year.  This  reminded  Naziaty  of  her  own  student  days  at  Universiti
               Teknologi Malaysia in the early 1980s, where the students’ rigorous technical competence was
               taught to be consistent with the philosophy and training of a skilled and good designer.
               Traveling around the city, Naziaty visited many places including parks, markets and religious
               buildings. Porto has noteworthy outstanding buildings and places such as the Casa das Musica
               by Rem Koolhas; the contemporary museum, Boa Nova Tea House, swimming pool and the
               FAUP building by Alvaro Siza; housing and office buildings by Souto de Moura and many
               more. The investigation on ‘accessible transportation’ using participant observation techniques
               included Naziaty traveling to Sao Bento from where she lived by using the bus service and the
               Metro. She noted that although Porto sits on a hilly terrain, the construction of the sidewalks
               and  the  availability  of  public  transportation  including  relatively  cheap  taxi  rides  made  it
               affordable  and  accessible  to  older  persons  and  physically  disabled  persons  (Naziaty  is  a
               wheelchair user). With the assistance of a tutor from FAUP, Clara, she managed to meet Lia
               Ferrera, an access officer at Porto Municipal. Lia gave a lot of insight regarding accessibility
               as she was a wheelchair user, more from the advocacy point of view. (Photo 3 and 4). Clara


                                                            79
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84