Page 74 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 74

AEI Insights, Vol 5, Issue 1, 2019


               Therefore, this book fits well into the ongoing discussion of East Asian development, analysing
               the role of the state, businesses as well as changes in international factors in affecting the
               development of South Korea and Taiwan. The author assesses how South Korea and Taiwan
               have been affected by China’s rapid development, the role of the small and medium enterprises
               (SMEs) in both countries, and the governments’ policies towards industrial upgrading and
               promotion of trade. The author also looked at some of the contemporary challenges faced by
               both countries namely income inequality and an ageing population.


               Summary of the book and main arguments

                                                                     st
               With the Asian Development Bank arguing that the 21  Century in the ‘Asian Century’, it is
               only natural to examine how the leaders of the Asian development experience has continued to
               grow in recent times (ADB 2011). The changing economic environment and the increasing
               trade interdependence demands that governments play a role in facilitating freer trade but at
               the same time provide the best means of growth and development for its people. This book
               takes  a  comparative  perspective  on  South  Korea  and  Taiwan’s  more  recent  economic
               development experience. As mentioned earlier, the author presented three main factors in the
               initial development experience of South Korea and Taiwan – the importance of the United
               States as a trade partner, the role of the state in terms of setting and implementing economic
               policies, and the effort of the private sector in driving growth.

               The role of the United States, the most important trading partner for Taiwan and South Korea,
               have been replaced with China. China’s changing economy also changed the dynamic of the
               business and trade of Taiwan and South Korea. Not only has Taiwan’s and South Korea’s
               investments and productions facilities in China have to adjust with China’s economic growth
               but the production effort has also begun to focus on producing for Chinese local market as
               opposed to export. China’s impact on manufacturing production was also discussed in the
               following chapter where “the relocation of labour-intensive manufacturing” meant that Taiwan
               and South Korea depended on China’s considerably cheap labour (p.88). This changed as China
               continued to grow and both South Korea and Taiwan’s manufacturing bases needed to relocate
               to different parts of China in order to continue benefiting from lower labour cost.

               The book provides an important viewpoint on the impact that China has had on what was
               previously two of East Asia’s faster-growing economies. In particular, Taiwan’s complicated
               relations with China has also shaped its economic relationship with its much larger neighbour.
               Much  of  Taiwan’s  outward  direct  investments  (ODI)  has  been  in  China  despite  policies
               discouraging investment (p.26). According to the author:
               The  “Southward  Policy”  was  launched  twice  in  the  1990s  with  an  aim  to  divert  Taiwan
               investors’ interest from China to Southeast Asia. Despite the policy discouragement, Taiwan’s
               investment in China continued to surge (p.26)
               In the following chapter, the author also explored how China’s economic rise also changed the
               environment for the small and medium industries of Taiwan and China. This is especially
               critical for Taiwan as Taiwanese SMEs were the main drivers of its export drive as opposed to
               South Korea’s reliance on its large conglomerates (chaebols). The rise of China has resulted
               not only in increasing labour cost which most SMEs can no longer afford but China’s industrial
               and technological catch-up has also created more competition for the manufacturing sectors of
               Taiwan and South Korea (p.89)

               In the case of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), both Taiwanese and South Korean SMEs
               focused on their domestic market and despite their declining contribution to export, the SMEs
               from both countries continue to provide a high percentage of domestic employment. However,


                                                            74
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79