Page 97 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 97

AEI Insights: An International Journal of Asia-Europe Relations, Vol 5, Issue 1, 2019, ISSN: 2289-800X


               ERRATA


               In:

               Maier-Knapp, N. (2017). Managing Cross-border Crises in Southeast Asia at Multiple Levels
               of  Governance:  Complementary  or  competitive  institutional  developments  at  the  national,
               ASEAN  regional  and  EU-ASEAN  inter-regional  levels? AEI  Insights:  An  International
               Journal of Asia-Europe Relations, 3(1), 3-20.
                1.  On    page    14,   paragraph    2   was    written   in   the   following    manner:
                    “However, reports about the plight of these Rohingya boat people by international human
                    rights organisations and media led to a considerable international outcry, compelling the
                    Thai government to act on this issue and the overall issue of trafficking in persons. While
                    the initial national response was limited to turning away the boat and dropping off food
                    from  helicopters,  greater  national  efforts  followed  after  intensive  international
                    condemnation to these actions which included the American downgrade of Thailand to a
                    Tier 3 country. Thailand is now ranked at the same level as Iraq and North Korea on
                    matters of trafficking in persons. In light of other severe revelations of slavery in the
                    fishing industry and the discovery of trafficking camps along Thailand’s borders, the Thai
                    government understood the necessity to display sincere and comprehensive commitments
                    this time and hence, Thai  government officials  attempted to  appease the international
                    community and halt further crisis construction.”

                    Given that Thailand was downgraded in the 2014 US Trafficking in Persons Report and
                    not  in  the  2015  US  Trafficking  in  Persons  Report,  the  paragraph  should  read:
                    “However, reports about the plight of these Rohingya boat people by international human
                    rights organisations and media led to a considerable international outcry, compelling the
                    Thai government to act on this issue and the overall issue of trafficking in persons. While
                    the initial national response was limited to turning away the boat and dropping off food
                    from  helicopters,  greater  national  efforts  followed  after  intensive  international
                    condemnation to these actions. In light of other severe revelations of slavery in the fishing
                    industry  and  the  discovery  of  trafficking  camps  along  Thailand’s  borders,  the  Thai
                    government understood the necessity to display sincere and comprehensive commitments
                    this time and hence, Thai  government officials  attempted to  appease the international
                    community and halt further crisis construction.”

                2.  On page 15, paragraph 1, the 27 May 2015 was given as the day of the special meeting.
                    The date of the special meeting should however read 29 May 2015.
                3.  Given the corrected date on page 15, paragraph 1 to 29 May 2015, paragraph 3 on page
                    15 should now read:
                    Then,  nine  days  later  at  the  ASEAN  special  meeting,  representatives  of  these  three
                    ASEAN  member  states  met  with  other  ASEAN  member  states,  UN  agencies,  and
                    international  country  partners  including  the  US,  Bangladesh,  Afghanistan,  Iran,  New
                    Zealand, Australia, Switzerland, and Japan to agree on a variety of common objectives.

                4.  Footnote 12 on page 13 reads: “Please see the previous discussion of the CMI in the
                    context of the Asian financial crisis on page X.”
                    It should read: “Please see the previous discussion of the CMI in the context of the Asian
                    financial crisis on page 9.”





                                                            97
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101