Page 27 - AEI Insights 2020 - Vol. 6, Issue 1

Bajrektarevic, 2020a

absorb Shem (Asians) and enslave and colonise Ham or Canaan (Black Africa and Indianos of
America). Amazingly, according to Genesis ch.9, verse 27: “God shall enlarge Japheth and he
12
shall dwell in the tents of Shem, and Canaan shall be his servant”.
(While Europe was to face a holocaust of 30-years War among essentially Rimo-Catholic
Christians, “Asians commercial and cosmopolitan cities formed a network of hubs spanning
numerous multi-ethnic and multilingual empires” – says Parag Khanna.)

The later Protestant revival infused the next wave of Christian missionaries to force this
narrative into the matrix of colonisation as ‘wilful’ implants onto the minds and bodies of
overseas peoples. Therefore, James Lorrimer and other architects of that-time political and
international legal order divided the world in three segments: civilized White, barbarous
Yellow and savage Black. Yellows were ‘fallen people’, inhabiting a terra infantilis, bound to
civilize (what will later evolve into indirect rule, with a social apartheid in place). The area
occupied by the Blacks, Redbones and Aborigine was a ‘borderless space’, terra nullius just to
conquer and settle, since the indigenous have no ‘birthright’ to it (meaning: physical
colonisation and direct rule, displacement final solution and genocide).
Even the champion of European rationalism, Max Weber, divinised Europe: “Protestant
Reformation and the Protestant ethic it spurred played a key role in facilitating the rise of
modern industrial society in Western Europe.” Before him, the world’s most famous
egalitarian, Karl Marx – who sow nations and states not as a statistical reality but as a
revolutionary cause – was not so enthusiastic in preaching the proletarian revolution beyond
the narrow western world. In Marx’s writings, Revolution is reserved for the advanced peoples
(that even excludes the eastern European Slavs), and is not meant for those civilisationally
behind.

Nevertheless, the unfinished business of ‘salvation of the world’ came back home; to Europe
th
of the 20 century. Hitler’s interpretation of it was: civilized White (Arian) – Central Europe;
Yellows (fated for indirect rule, with ‘only’ social apartheid in place) – Atlantic and
Scandinavian Europe; Blacks (whose territory is predestined for a physical colonisation by the
superior race upon a decisive final solution and genocide) – all Slavic states of Eastern and
13
Russophone Europe.
th
Indeed, ever since the 18 century on, European notion that ‘civilization’ was the monopoly of
the West, clearly implied that there is no civilization – and therefore, salvation – outside the
14
western model. To comply fully with this new myth, the civilizational late comer from the

12 “The poor you will always have with you, and you can help them any time you want. But you will not always
have me…” /Mark 14:7-9 (NIV) New International Version/ was a Biblical verse, allegedly spelled out by Jesus
from Nazareth. It was among most quoted and misused lines – as to justify Europocentrism, exceptionalism and
institutionalisation of inequality which then and there have started its global conquest.
13 To illustrate a centuries-long residual climate of jingoism, later conceptualised and postulated as the European
ideology of Biologism, let us quote the III Reich’s Biology schoolbook: “The meaning of all life is struggle. Woe
to him who sins against this law. Our Führer reminds us: ’He who wants to live must fight, and he who does not
want to fight in this world of perpetual struggle does not deserve to live!’ (Mein Kampf, p. 317) Hence, ‘the world
does not exist for cowardly nations’. (Mein Kampf, p. 105).” (For the full quote see appendix: Biology for the Middle
School, The 5th Grade Girls; chapter: The Laws of Nature and Humanity, Textbook of 1942)
14 The Spirit of Laws and other writings of Montesquieu were the most decisive influencers on the French
revolutionaries, Jacobins and Napoleon himself. In the hands of French revolutionaries, Buonaparte and later his
own nephew – Napoleon III, the Montesquieu’s teaching shaped the administrative and legal order of Europe up
to this very day. How did Montesquieu see Europe and the world? Well, Montesquieu registered the geographic
regularity in prosperity and poverty concentration. His explanation to it was the geography hypothesis: that people
in tropical climates tended to be ‘lazy and to lack inquisitiveness.’ Consequently, they didn’t work hard, were not
innovative, which ultimately led them to poverty. Montesquieu further speculated that lazy people tended to be

27