Page 44 - AEI Insights 2020 - Vol. 6, Issue 1
P. 44

AEI Insights, Vol 6, Issue 1, 2020



               Asia  Europe  Meeting  (ASEM)  and  Organisation  for  Economic  Cooperation  Development
               (OECD) has become closer and it is always based on mutual learning and trust as well as
               knowledge  commitment  (Johanson  &  Kao,  2010;  Masum  &  Road,  2012).  The  network
               approach  in  international  cooperation  also  helps  to  develop  long-term  relationships  with
               individuals  and  organisation  worldwide  (Hadley  &  Wilson,  2003).  Ruzzier,  Hisrich,  &
               Antoncic (2006) stated that networking in internationalisation could be applied to overcome
               knowledge, technology, resources and trust issues in the international market.

               The important element featured by the network model of internationalisation is the bridging
               mechanism  (Mtigwe,  2006)  which  permits  continuous  internationalisation  and  allows
               multilateral  influences  on  international  decision  making  (Johanson  and  Mattsson  1988;
               Johanson and Vahlne 1990). Networking in internationalisation is divided into three types of
               relationships. Firstly, a formal relationship with financial commitment (Rastorgueva, 2014),
               secondly, an informal relationship with loose contacts between members and relationship with
               other networks members (Birley, 1985) and finally, an intermediary relationship that  relates
               to  influences  of  third  party  and  indirect  connections  (Ojala,  2009).  There  are  three  vital
               rationales  or  motivations  for  networking  in  internationalisation.  These  are  resource  and
               knowledge sharing, mutual learning and strengthening positions against competitors in the
               market (Girdzijauskaite & Radzeviciene, 2014). According to Girdzijauskaitė et al. (2019), the
               existing government to government (G-to G) cooperation between nations will innovate to
               multilateral partnerships if there are complex activities or actions and multifaceted partners.
               This  process  always  happens  in  higher  education  internationalisation  because  it  involves
               various  activities,  projects  and  programmes  amongst  several  parties  internally  and
               internationally.  A  strong  networking  between  nation  and  higher  education  institutions  is
               required to internationalise higher education. Therefore, it could be deduced that the network
               theory  of  internationalisation  is  the  most  appropriate  one  to  apply  to  higher  education
               internationalisation at national and institutional level.


               Networking for internationalisation of higher education
               There  are  multifaceted  administration  and  bureaucracy,  vibrant  cooperation  and  vast
               networking dimensions in higher education sector consisting stakeholders at the ministries,
               departments,  agencies and higher education institutions  (Szyszlo,  2016). One of the major
               factors affecting the internationalisation of higher education is the recruitment of international
               students  followed  by  the  benefits  for  economic  and  socio-cultural  rationale.  International
               networking plays a crucial role for higher education institutions to work closely with their
               international partners to increase international students. The bridging mechanism characteristic
               of networking in internationalisation could become a very useful strategy and approach to
               increase  international  students.  The  market  information  and  penetration  tactics  are  also  a
               valuable tool of networking in internationalisation to achieve the desired international students.
               The  intermediary  function  of  networking  has  assisted  higher  education  providers  to  gain
               information  on  international  students  around  the  world  and  get  them  to  enrol  in  higher
               education institutions (Sarkar & Perényi, 2017).

               The nations involved in the massive internationalisation of higher education emphasises the
               development of policies and action plans for international  cooperation in higher education
               (Kristensen  &  Karlsen,  2018).  Institutional  networking  between  local  and  foreign  higher
               education institutions is the fastest way to implement the internationalisation approaches and
               strategies  (Mader  et  al.,  2013).  Girdzijauskaite  &  Radzeviciene  (2014)  mentioned  that,
               currently,  the  higher  education  institutions’  networking  in  internationalisation  is  an
               encouraging type of international cooperation, which creates a pathway to enter the foreign


                                                           44
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49