Page 39 - AEI Insights 2020 - Vol. 6, Issue 1
P. 39

Munusamy and Hashim, 2020



               •  The programme approach

               The  programme  approach  involves  budget  and  money  to  organise  activities,  forums,
               conferences  and  programmes  at  the  international  level.  This  approach  also  underlines  the
               importance  of  exchanges  of  students  and  staff  and  networking  in  internationalisation  for
               teaching, curriculum development and research cooperation (Knight, 2008a). This approach
               can be materialised at  both  national  and institutional  level  and a  well-coordinated team is
               necessary to execute the programme approach (Qiang, 2003).

               •  The rationale approach
               The second approach, the “rationale” approach, is most imperative for national-level higher
               education  internationalisation  (Knight,  2008a).  Initially,  Knight  (2008)  mentioned  that
               effective rationale approaches are competitiveness, human resources development, strategic
               alliances,  income  generation,  commercial  trade,  nation-  building,  and  community
               development. However, recently scholars adopted four imperative rationales at national and
               institutional level, which are socio-cultural, political, economic and academic (de Wit, 2002,
               2011 & Farina et al., 2015).
               •  The ad hoc approach

               The  third  approach,  the  ad  hoc  approach,  refers  to  quick  reactions  to  the  internationally
               available chances in higher education (Knight, 1999). This is a loose approach as there is no
               right or wrong direction in choosing the opportunities that are available. Therefore, the national
               government and institutions participate individually in numerous programmes, projects and
               activities internationally when obtainable and applicable (Knight 2008a).
               •  The policy Approach

               The policy approach defines the importance of policies which emphasise the significance of
               the  international  dimension  in  higher  education  (Knight,  2008a).  The  policies  may  be
               established  or  introduced  by  various  stakeholders  such  as  higher  education  departments,
               qualifications agencies, foreign affairs, immigration departments, international trade ministries
               and other relevant ministries, departments and agencies involve directly and indirectly in higher
               education development.

               •  The strategic approach
               Lastly,  the  strategic  approach  involves  tangible  actions  and  plans  carried  out  by  national
               governments, agencies and higher education institutions to execute effectively the process of
               internationalisation  of  the  higher  education.  This  approach  inevitably  assists  all  parties
               involved  in  higher  education  internationalisation  to  achieve  the  goal  and  objectives  of
               internationalisation (Knight, 2008a).

               Although these five approaches are applicable at both national and institutional level, Knight
               (2008a) agreed that institutions may have different guiding principles on internationalisation.
               Therefore, she recommends five tolerable additional approaches, namely, activity, outcomes,
               process, cross border and ethos. The important point noted in applying various approaches in
               higher  education  internationalisation  is  the  linkages  or  connection  between  stakeholders
               involve in internationalisation activities. Strong networking or inter-connection is considerably
               required to sustain and maintain the approaches in internationalisation as it brings together all
               the interested parties to internationalise higher education at national and institutional level
               (Knight, 2004a).





                                                           39
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44