Page 64 - BUKU PANDUAN SARJANA 20142015_BI
P. 64

viva voce with regard to his dissertation.

                          (e)    The Committee of Examiners shall determine the method of conducting the viva
                                 voce with regard to the dissertation of a candidate.

                          (f)    The Committee of Examiners may, if needed, invite a teacher of the University
                                 who is experienced and possesses the expertise in relation to the field of the
                                 candidate’s research, to attend the meeting of the Committee of Examiners and
                                 the viva voce of the candidate.

                          (g)     The Committee of Examiners shall after considering the reports of the examiners,
                                 the dissertation of the candidate and viva voce (if any), decide and recommend
                                 that the candidate

                                 (i)     be conferred a Master’s degree with Distinction subject to the condition
                                         as provided under regulation 45(2); or

                                 (ii)    has achieved sufficient merit to be conferred a Degree without any
                                         corrections; or

                                 (iii)    has  achieved  sufficient  merit  to be  conferred  a degree  subject  to  the
                                         candidate  making  minor  corrections  as  proposed  by  the  examiners
                                         within  a  period  not  exceeding  three  months  and  verified  by  the
                                         supervisor; or

                                 (iv)    has achieved sufficient merit to be conferred a degree subject to the
                                         candidate making major corrections as proposed by the examiners
                                         within a period not exceeding six months and verified by the Internal
                                         Examiner;

                                 (v)     is required to conduct further research and submit his dissertation for re-
                                         examination over a period between six to twelve months from the date of
                                         the decision of the Senate; or

                                 (vi)    has not achieved academic merit and recommend to the Senate that the
                                         candidate has failed in the examination of the dissertation and is not
                                         permitted to submit his dissertation for re-examination.

                          (h)    Notwithstanding  the  provisions  of  subparagraph  (v),  further  work  for  a  period
                                 exceeding twelve months shall be recommended by the Committee of Examiners
                                 in special circumstances and based on the reports of the examiners.

                                  (i)    For the purpose of these Regulations ―further work means revisions to
                                         and re-writing of the dissertation including further research on the topic
                                         of the dissertation. ―Re-examination  means  a  reassessment  of  the
                                         dissertation by the Committee of Examiners after further work has
                                         been done.

                                 (ii)    A candidate is required to conduct further work may be required by the
                                         Committee of Examiners to attend a viva voce (if needed) regarding his
                                         dissertation for the second time.



                                                                                           64
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69