Page 50 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 50

AEI Insights, Vol 5, Issue 1, 2019


               the emergence of a new Islamic intellectualism led by a new generation of Islamic thinkers and
               activists who, since the early 1970s, have sought to develop a new format for political Islam in
                                                                                    10
               which substance, rather  than form,  serves as  the primary orientation.   Domestically, after
               political Islam was oppressed during the early phase of the New Order government, Muslims
               cadres  turn  to  greater  introspection  (Watson,  1994,  p.  186).    As  a  result,  many  Muslims
               involved with the religious discourse saw it as a period of moral rearmament. This activity rose
               as a response to a strong feeling of malaise throughout the country, which can be construed as
               a reaction both to blatant corruption in official circles and to grosser forms of materialism
               (Watson, 1994).
               Intellectually, there has been cooperation between the Ministry of Religion and other Western
               universities to send Indonesian Muslim students to study Islam. As such, liberal Islam also
               spread  throughout  the  country.  Fazlur  Rahman’s  thought,  as  noted  by  Bruinessen  (2002),
               became very influential  in  Indonesia due to  the  facts  that several  Indonesian scholars  had
               studied  with  him  in  Chicago  and  became  the  propagators  and  defenders  of  his  ideas.
                                                                                                    11
               Undoubtedly due to them, many Indonesian young scholars developed his ideas further.
               Both formalistic and substantive Muslims are in agreement with the democratic system. In fact,
               senior supporters of Masyumi were the proponents of the western democratic system during
               the  Sukarno  era.  With  the  demise  of  Suharto’s  government  that  marked  “reform”  and
               democratisation,  Muslims  have  again  been  given  wider  space  in  Indonesian  politics.  The
               formalistic  legalistic  Muslim  groups  gradually  formed  Islamic  movements  whose  basic
               ideology have been based on Islam, Qur’an and Sunnah. This group was sometimes called
               ‘radical’ and ‘fundamentalist’. Radicalism, thus, does not refer to one particular religion in a
               particular  place  but  is  a  universal  occurrence  that  can  happen  in  all  religious  traditions.
               According to the social sciences, radical social movements, regardless of whether there is a
               religious  impute  or  not,  can  be  seen  as  movements  of  defiance  (McAdam,  1999).  This  is
               because  their  attitudes,  views,  and  social  behaviours  are  markedly  different  from  those  of
               mainstream society.

               According  to  the  modern  political  approach,  radical  movements,  as  noted  by  Jamhari,  are
               rebellious, but should be rather seen as a natural movement consisting of individual political
               goals (Jamhari, 2003, p. 19). Radical Muslims movement as one form of the Islamic revivalism
               is best explained by anthropologists. For them, it is a movement which is inspired by cultural
               and  religious  factors  and  is  a  response  to  an  external  power  –  such  as  colonialism  or  the
               introduction of a foreign culture. It uses cultural and religious symbols in opposition to the
               symbols used in mainstream society. As such this movement is a form of struggle against and
               rejection of foreign cultural and power (Jamhari, 2003).
               In the modern era, the majority of people are pre-occupied by the materialist and hedonistic
               lifestyle, and their lives, thus, have been wrongly-directed. The religious groups who perform
               their religious practices and enjoin people to do good and forbid them from doing evil have
               been labelled as ‘radical’ or ‘fundamental’. But since these religious practices are carried out
               only by a small number of people, and the Islamic revivalism is always precipitated by a small





               10  This was basically advocated by the proponent of Cultural Islam led by Nurcholish Madjid. In this model,
               Madjid introduced the notion of religious renewal, political reform and social transformation (Effendy, 2003).
               11  These are graduates from the Western universities and propagated the Islamic liberal which was characterised
               as rationalist, secular, pluralist. Harun Nasution, Nurcholish Madjid and others introduced the reformation of the
               Islamic ideas, especially on socio-political issues in Indonesia. Their writings are used as guidance on how the
               Muslims should endeavour in order to realise the socio-political objectives of Islam in this modern world (Effendy,
               2003).

                                                            50
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55