Page 19 - AEI Insights 2018 Vol 4 Issue 1
P. 19

NEW GLOBAL UNCERTAINTIES AND ITS MEANING FOR
                                     EUROPEAN UNION INTEGRATION?

                                                    Bruno Mascitelli

                                Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia

                                                  bmascitelli@swin.edu.au


               Abstract

               The concept of European Union integration has been at the forefront of much discussion on
               what the future of the European Union project would be. At various junctions, especially in
               crisis times, the concept of integration would be code for a balance sheet on its progress and
               future challenges. The uncertainties that have merged since the British referendum decision to
               leave  the  European  Union  in  June  2016,  has  provided  a  new  framework  for  the  future  of
               European integration.  It has seen the first departure of a member, and not an insignificant
               member, from the Union alongside destabilizing features in the world order. The dismissive
               approach from the Trump administration and the volatility of US foreign policy has put many
               in the EU on tender hooks.  Moreover, European Union member states have had to contend
               with a volatile Euro-sceptic electorate, which has blamed the European Union for a crisis of
               expectations. The election results in 2017 in The Netherlands, and the victory of Macron in
               France,  provided  for  some,  reason  to  believe  that  not  all  was  lost.  The  leadership  of  the
               European Union has taken a sober approach towards the current crisis and has refrained from
               submission to this pessimism. Though locked in negotiations with the UK over Brexit, its
               release of the White Paper on the future of the European Union issued in March 2017 was an
               attempt to insure that Brussels and the EU was not ruling from on–high without member state
               buy in. It was a document which was partially defensive (only mentioning Brexit once) but at
               the  same  time  seeking  a  guide  on  whether,  and  how,  to  approach  future  European  Union
               integration.

               Keywords: European Union, integration, Brexit, EU White Paper, global uncertainty

               Introduction

               European  integration  is  a  much-discussed  concept  and  code  for  describing  the  state  and
               progress of the European Union (EU). In effect, everything related to the European Union in
               both its growth and its crisis is about its integration or lack thereof. As the European Union
               (and its predecessors) since its foundation years of the early 1950s, grew in size and depth, the
               matter  of  its  progress  and  integration  became  equally  important.  The  growth  of  the  EU
               proceeded in grouped accessions from its original six (Germany, France, Italy and the Benelux
               countries) founding members. In the 1970s the UK, Ireland and Denmark acceded followed by
               the 1980s accession of Greece, Spain and Portugal. In the 1990s Austria, Sweden and Finland
               joined  making  by  the  mid-1990s  a  solid  and  cohesive  grouping  of  15  western  European
               member states. With the end of the Cold War in Europe and the reunification of Germany, it
               was only natural that the EU turned its attention to the new market economies previously in the
               orbit of the former Soviet Union. This included eight nations from Central and Eastern Europe
               as well as the two island states of the Greek section of Cyprus and Malta. The accession in
               2004 of these mostly eastern European nations however was a major extension of the European
               Union and in the view of some “a bridge too far” for the European Union. The countries had
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24