Page 66 - ASEAN-EU Dialogue 2018: Regional and Inter-Regional Economic Cooperation: Identifying Priorities for ASEAN and the EU
P. 66

Likewise, it would appear that employers and professional associations are not necessarily fully
               involved in the implementation of the MRAs, although there are on-going efforts to increase
               awareness at the level of the ASEAN Business Club and ASEAN Business Advisory Council
               (Papademetriou et. al., 2015). However, for businesses to hire a foreign professional, it must
               make economic sense in terms of the workers’ ability to contribute towards better productivity,
               efficiency and higher profits for the firm, notwithstanding supply shortages. There are as yet,
               not enough studies to show that this is the case for ASEAN, to motivate firms to move towards
               hiring foreign ASEAN professionals, except in perhaps an acute labour shortage situation.

               Conclusion
               Although the AEC was launched in 2015, numerous targets in the AEC Blueprint were not met
               and these were carried forward to the AEC 2025 vision (ASEAN Secretariat, 2015). Likewise,
               the movement of skilled labour was also carried forward to the 2025 vision, to specifically
               include the movement  of business  visitors who are engaged in  trade in  goods,  services  or
               investments. It reiterates that the objective for facilitating the movement of skilled labour is to
               allow these professional practitioners to practice in other AMS. The Consolidated Strategic
               Action Plan for the AEC 2025 indicates that there are two main priority actions, namely to
               expand and deepen commitments under the ASEAN Agreement on MNP where appropriate;
               and reduce, if not standardise, documentation requirements (ASEAN Secretariat, 2018f).

               The review in this chapter indicates that the issue of skilled labour mobility does not necessarily
               lie in the commitments but in the implementation issues. While ASEAN has made progress in
               this area, it has been slow and laborious. In particular, better data collection on the professional
               workers  who  are  actually  working  in  each  AMS  is  badly  needed  as  the  applications  of
               registered foreign professionals to work in another AMS may not fully capture the situation on
               the ground. More studies are therefore needed to ascertain the actual extent of mobility and as
               to  whether  ASEAN  initiatives  have  contributed  towards  this  mobility,  however  limited.
               Though the reduction of documentation will be helpful in reducing bureaucratic delays, perhaps
               greater  attention  to  general  principles  of  transparency  and  free  information-sharing  on
               processes  and  procedures  may  help  the  professional  workers  to  better  understand  what  is
               needed to work in another AMS.




















                                                                                                       60
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71