Page 13 - AEI Insights 2019 - Vol. 5, Issue 1
P. 13

Furuoka et al, 2019


               responsibilities. The Nordic model of female labour supply which emphasises on work-life
               balance  is  highly  successful,  with  Norway  having  the  highest  rate  of  female  labour  force
               participation among OECD countries (Kinoshita and Guo, 2015). Recent statistics show that
               about 83 percent of mothers with young children are employed (Kinoshita and Guo, 2015).
               This  is  attributed  to  comprehensive  parental  provisions  and  subsidised  child  day-care  for
               working parents.
               Nordic  countries  are  often  known  as  ‘welfare  states’  and  generally  provide  ample  social
               security to  their workers (Furuoka, 2017b).  For  example, Finland extends generous public
               support to families through high levels of maternity and parental leave allowances, long periods
               of payment and excellent day-care service provisions (Kinoshita and Guo, 2015). Additionally,
               strong gender equality in Nordic countries provides equal opportunity and labour market access
               to women (OECD, 2018). The utilisation of female workers, especially in view of their rising
               education level in the long term, can contribute to a country’s economic growth. Non-standard
               work forms provide more alternative to workers, enabling them to remain employed while
               enjoying greater personal autonomy, increased earning potential, flexibility, and more control
               over work-life balance (Walker, 2011). This can potentially reduce unemployment problems.
               Furuoka (2017b) suggests that this explains why some European countries, such as Nordic
               welfare states, may not have problems of high unemployment.

               Figure 2 presents the unemployment rates of Nordic countries from 1980 to 2015. Despite some
               occasional  differences  among  them,  there  is  still  a  common  pattern  in  the  unemployment
               dynamics of these countries, especially since the mid-2000s.  In the 1980s, the unemployment
               rates in Nordic countries, with the exception of Denmark, were low, at four percent or less.
               Although the mid-1990s saw a rise in these figures, instances of high unemployment were
               relatively short-lived compared to other European countries such as Germany, France, Spain
               and Italy.  Norway, in particular, has maintained an unemployment rate of approximately four
               percent since the late 1990s, while the rates for Denmark and Sweden have been stabilising at
               less than eight percent over the past ten years. In other words, these countries seem to have
               smaller unemployment issues than other European economies.  It should be noted that Norway
               is one of the wealthiest countries in the region and the country provides well-established social
               security for its workers. In spite of its provision of generous social security protection, Norway
               does not face the problem of unemployment hysteresis. In other words, existence of strong
               employment protection could result in a high unemployment problem in the Nordic countries
               due to the lack of sufficient flexibility to counter-balance the negative effects of business cycle.
               However, it is likely that existence of flexible working and non-standard employment practices
               would provide a good cushion to absorb be negative impact of business cycle. It would mean
               that the Nordic countries are exceptional European countries which would not suffer from the
               higher unemployment rates.























                                                            13
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18