Page 62 - Accreditation Manual for Program Owner -300424
P. 62

Accreditation Manual for Program Owner




                                     To write                    Evidence/Appendix                 P   F  R
             7.1.9 Must have an      Explain how departmental CQI                                      √  √
             integral link between the   processes help to achieve vision,
             departmental quality    mission, and goals of the HEP
             assurance processes and   (aligned with area 1.1.1)
             the achievement of the
             institutional purpose.



            ODL

                                                                                                   Reference
             7.1.1 The department must have clear policies and appropriate mechanisms for regular monitoring   7.1.1
                 and review of the programme.

             7.1.2 The department must have a Quality Assurance (QA) unit/personnel for internal quality   7.1.2
                 assurance of the department to work hand-in-hand with the QA unit of the HEP.

             7.1.3 The department must have an internal programme monitoring and review committee with a   Refer
                 designated head responsible for continual review of the programme content and ODL learning   below
                 support services to ensure its currency and relevancy.

             7.1.4 The department’s review system must constructively engage stakeholders including ODL or   7.1.4
                 technology experts, alumni and employers, whose views are taken into consideration. (This
                 standard must be read together with Standard 1.2.3 in Area 1.)

             7.1.5 The department must make the programme review report accessible to stakeholders.   7.1.5

             7.1.6 The department must show that the programme monitoring and review are conducted    7.1.6
                 periodically, using proper mechanisms and resources, including benchmarked data (student
                 performance, progression, attrition,  graduation and  employment/career advancement),
                 learning methods and technologies, administration and related educational services.
             7.1.7 In collaborative arrangements, the partners involved must share the responsibilities of   7.1.7
                 programme monitoring and review. (This standard must be read together with Standard 6.1.5
                 in Area 6.)
             7.1.8 The findings of a programme review by the department must be presented to the highest   7.1.8
                 academic board of the institution for its attention and further action.

             7.1.9 There must be an integral link between the departmental quality assurance processes and the   7.1.9
                 achievement of the institutional purpose.


                                     To write                           Evidence/Appendix          P   F  R
             7.1.3 Must have an internal   Organization chart of the Curriculum   1)  Letter of appointment for   √  √
             monitoring and review   Committee (Department and/or faculty   the Curriculum Committee
             committee.              level)                               (Department and/or faculty
                                     Table on the meetings conducted by the   level)
                                     curriculum committee with the following   2)  Minutes of the Curriculum
                                     columns Date/ purpose/List of findings/   Committee (Department and/
                                     actions taken to address findings).  or Faculty) on the internal
                                                                          monitoring and review.
                                     Table on the review of the learning support
                                     services with the following columns: Type
                                     of learning support service (LMS, SIM,
                                     assessment, administration, ICT system,
                                     physical facilities), frequency of review, CQI
                                     actions taken)



                                                            56
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67