Page 61 - Accreditation Manual for Program Owner -300424
P. 61

Guidelines for Preparing and Submission of the Programme Accreditation Report




                                     To write                    Evidence/Appendix                 P   F  R
             7.1.4 Must engage       Table showing the following   6)  Minutes of meeting with the   √  √  √
             stakeholders in programme   columns: Type of stakeholder   stakeholders (industry and alumni)
             review.                 (Industry/ alumni, employer,   7)  Minutes on CQI for the comments from
                                     student), comments given, and   the different stakeholders (if available)
                                     the actions taken. (should be in   8)  PLP appointment letter and term of
                                     line with the stakeholders listed   reference (if available);
                                     in references for 1.2.3)    9)  PLP report;
                                     Table on the PLP major comments   10) Programme report on action taken
                                     and the progress of the actions   based on PLP report.
                                     that have been taken.       11) Report on Students’ exit survey or
                                                                    interview (if available)



             7.1.5 Must make the     List how the Programme report   12) Evidence of making programme review   √  √
             programme review report   is accessible to stakeholders and   report accessible to stakeholders
             accessible to stakeholders.  which stakeholder can access it.   (Yearly report or new curriculum
                                                                    structure or other review results
                                                                    shown to stakeholders in the form of
                                                                    website, emails, meetings)
             7.1.6 Must analyse student   Table stating the CQI actions   13) Minutes on discussing the student   √  √
             performance for the     based on the data as shown in   performance, progression, attrition,
             purpose of continual quality   Table C1 with 3 columns listing the   graduation and employment and
             improvement.            concerns/the actions taken/ the   the continual quality improvement
                                     outcomes                       suggested and implemented.
                                     Table on the Tracer study for the   14) Course Outcome analysis form
                                     past 3 years                   samples for certain courses for the
                                                                    past 3 years.
                                                                 15) Yearly report for the past 3 years
                                     Summary of CQI carried out  16) Programme Outcome analysis for the
                                      (Can be extracted from Course   past 3 cohorts
                                     outcome analysis, Yearly report,   17) PEO achievement analysis (for
                                     Programme Outcome analysis,    provisional and full accreditation, the
                                     Programme Educational          PEO assessment plan)
                                     Objectives analysis or other   18) Survey on graduate employability (type
                                     sources)                       of job, salary). Tracer study


             7.1.7 Must share the    Table showing the list of   19) Minutes of meeting with Collaborators   √  √  √
             responsibilities of     collaborators and their roles in   or communication with collaborators
             programme monitoring    the programme monitoring and   (if relevant)
             and review with partner in   review (if any)        20) MOU with the collaborator (if relevant)
             collaborative arrangements.  Relevant content in the MoU/MoA
                                     with collaborators
             7.1.8 Must present the   Flowchart on the process of   21) Snipping from the senate meeting   √  √
             findings of programme   sending the Curriculum Review   stating the approval of the curriculum
             review to the HEP.      documentation (as in UM        review.
                                     Portal _ PTj Info)) to ASP C and   22) Evidence showing presentation of
                                     subsequently the approval      Programme review (E..g. Curriculum
                                     process at JKIK and Senate.    review, yearly report) to the central
                                                                    (E.g. Senate, ASP, QMEC). Can be
                                                                    (email/ letters)












                                                            55
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66