Page 23 - Accreditation Manual for Program Owner -300424
P. 23

Guidelines for Preparing and Submission of the Programme Accreditation Report



               2.  Must include a relevant title and also a short description to ensure (the panel understand what has been
                   shown).

            Rubrics:
               1.  Marking schemes or assessment rubrics
            Digital communication:
               1.  Instead  of  physical  letters/announcement,  official  communication  can  occur  through  emails  or  other
                   electronic format.
               2.  Personnels involved should be clear (to, cc, from)
               3.  The snipping of the relevant information as required.
            Sample of… (to prove some processed has been carried out.)
               1.  All the letters, forms and documents related to that process.

            Evidence of…
               1.  The Programme Owner can choose to give others relevant evidence deemed fit to support that requirement.



            Labelling of the attachments
            The attachment should be labelled in the following:
               Attachment “subsection”_”evidence number as stated in template” “a,b,c according to your order” “short
            description of the evidence”. E.g.  Attachment 1.1_1a Minutes of meeting.



            How to read the guidelines
            The guidelines are broken down into the sub-areas. Each sub-area may have six components as listed below.
               1.  The main statement for the sub-area will first be mentioned
               2.  The standards for the sub area as extracted from the COPPA will be shown in the shaded box.
               3.  The key information on how to write the sub-area is shown in a Table with 6 columns.
                   a)  Column 1: Show the requirements for each standard
                   b)  Column 2: Suggest on what to write to address that standard
                   c)  Column 3: Suggest the evidence required for that standard
                   d)  Column 4 to 6: Show whether the evidence is required for the different type of accreditation through
                       the “X” mark. (P: Provisional, F: Full accreditation, R: Reaccreditation).

               4.  The standards for the sub area as extracted from the COPPA:ODL will be shown in the shaded box. There is
                   an extra column “Reference”.
                   a)  If we see a number there, then the standard for ODL will require similar write up and evidence as the
                       typical COPPA standards (as shown from the number).
                   b)  If we see “refer below”, then the standard for ODL may require some extra information or write up.
               5.  The key information (similar to item 3) specific for ODL programmes. This part may be missing if there is no
                   “refer below” as stated in item 4b.
               6.  Sample of the “Compulsory Guided Tables”. This part may be missing if there is no “Compulsory Guided
                   Tables” for that sub-area.




















                                                            17
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28