Page 34 - Accreditation Manual for Program Owner -300424

Accreditation Manual for Program Owner

To write Evidence/Appendix P F R
1.3.5 Must encourage Table listing the courses attended (or 4) Evidences showing √ √
innovations. books read) and the innovative initiatives encouragement of innovative
in teaching learning and assessment teaching: E.g.
(eg. Professional/ specialized staff training) a. Minutes of meeting to
encourage and discussed
• Relevant courses, conferences & innovative teaching, learning
Seminars and assessment (if available)
• Sabbatical to other centre of b. Emails or reminders to lecturers
excellence to attend talks or seminars on
• Educational resource person innovative teaching, learning
appointed by faculty (if any) and assessment (if available)
• UM-LiTeR c. Innovative teaching, learning
and assessment is part of the
The use of analytics tools to monitor KPI (if available)
student activities for ODL programme
5) Supporting evidences on the √ √
innovative initiatives that has
been carried out.
6) Report on the analytics to monitor √
student learning activities
7) CQI actions on the analytics report
√ √

AREA 2: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

2.1 Relationship between Assessment and Learning Outcomes

2.1.1 Assessment principles, methods and practices must be aligned to the learning outcomes of the programme,
consistent with the levels defined in the MQF.

2.1.2 The alignment between assessment and the learning outcomes in the programme must be systematically
and regularly reviewed to ensure its effectiveness.

To write Evidence/Appendix P F R
2.1.1 Assessment principles, methods Table B1 with 2 columns, 1) Refer to reference in 1.2.5 √ √ √
and practices must be aligned to, PLO (with MQF cluster) and
and consistent with the respective assessment methods.
levelsdefined in the MQF Mapping of all the courses
of the programme, to the
programme’s PLOs and MQF
clusters.
2.1.2 The alignment between A Table listing the changes in 2) Policy or mechanism on √ √ √
assessment and the learning the assessment methods for reviewing the assessments.
outcomes must be regularly reviewed the past 3 years, for the various 3) Minutes of meeting on √ √
to ensure its effectiveness. courses. discussion of the alignment
between assessments and the
learning outcomes.
Compulsory guided Tables. (The Table numbering can be changed)

28