Page 37 - Accreditation Manual for Program Owner -300424

Guidelines for Preparing and Submission of the Programme Accreditation Report

2.3 Management of Student Assessment

2.3.1 The department and its academic staff must have an adequate level of autonomy in the management of
student assessment.
(This standard may not be applicable to certain programme arrangements.)

2.3.2 There must be mechanisms to ensure the security of assessment documents and records.
2.3.3 The assessment results must be communicated to students before the commencement of a new semester
to facilitate progression decision.

2.3.4 The department must have appropriate guidelines and mechanisms for students to appeal their course
results.

2.3.5 The department must periodically review the management of student assessment and act on the findings
of the review.
(For MQF Level 6 and above, the review must involve external examiners.)

To write Evidence/Appendix P* F R
2.3.1 Must have an Table B2 stating the power of each 1) Letter of appointment on the √ √ √
adequate level person in the management of the management of student assessment.
of autonomy for student assessment. (Penyelaras peperiksaan, surat kuasa
department and staff. ambil kertas soalan, moderator kertas
peperiksaan, etc).
2.3.2 Must have Table stating the confidentiality and 2) Supporting evidences (i.e. surat √ √
mechanisms to security of the student assessment kerahsiaan, policy on password
ensure the security of documents of the different stages. protected softcopy documents,
assessment documents Question formulation, moderation, guideline for setting exam questions
and records. storage, printing and distribution. in a secure manner, picture of the bilik
Should have the following columns: kebal, etc.)
Stage/Person in charge/ mechanism
for confidentiality and security
2.3.3 Must communicate Table stating assessment feedback to 3) Evidences of feedback on assessments √ √
with students before students with the following columns: is provided to students.
the commencement of a Assessment method/ when the 4) Evidence of final result is given before √ √ √
new semester. feedback is given (which week)/ How the registration of the following
the feedback is given (spectrum/ semester. (Maya screenshot and also
lecture/etc.)/ Type of feedback given schedule of exam handling-highlight
(marks/ grades/ sample solution/ why the date of publishing results).
answer is wrong)
2.3.4 Must have Flowchart of the appeal process 5) Documented appeal policy √ √ √
mechanisms for 6) Mechanism for the appeal process √ √ √
students to appeal.
7) Evidences appeal policy is √ √
communicated to students
8) Sample of one student going through √ √
the appeal process (if available)
2.3.5 Must be periodically Table showing the review of the 9) Minutes of meeting of discussion √ √
reviewed. management of student assessment, on the management of student
should have Date/ discussion/ action assessment
*For provisional, just show the empty forms (or explain what the programme owner intend to do).

31